clex_monkie89: Close-cropped picture of Sam and Dean Winchester sitting far closer than normal people. (Class - Pillage and Plunder)
clex_monkie89 ([personal profile] clex_monkie89) wrote2007-10-19 06:09 pm

Child Abuse Investigations

Out of class early.

CHILD ABUSE INVESTIGATION

ARS = Arizona Revised Statues 

  • Child abuse likely to produce death or serious injury, intentionally or knowingly, is a class two felony (ARS) 13-1632
  • Severe, intentional child abuse done from birth to the day before the 15th birthday is considered Dangerous Crimes Against Children (ARS) 13-401.01
  • If likely to not produce death or serious injury, intentionally or knowingly, it is only a class 4 felony.
  • Beatings used to be common and accepted; they were kept in the family with little to no police or social agency involvement.
  • Now days some children may cry "abuse" from the slightest things, they threaten their parents with reports if they don't get their way and there is an assumption that any mark present is an abuse (such as a red mark from a spanking).
  • Sexual Abuse includes; molestation, sexual conduct with a minor, sexual exploitation of a minor.
  • Neglect is failing to provide the basic needs for a child (Food, shelter, proper clothing, etc) and/or contributing to the delinquency and dependency of a minor (drinking or smoking with a minor).
  • Arizona has a mandated reporting law for child abuse (ARS) 13-3620
  • Arizona cops are considered on-duty 24/7.
  • Failure to report, except involving reportable offenses, makes you guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor (up to a year in jail and up to $2,500 fine).
  • Reportable offenses include: Furnishing harmful items to minors (ARS) 13-3506.01, Surreptitious photographing, videotaping, filming or digitally recording or viewing (ARS) 13-3019, Child prostitution (ARS) 13-3212, Incest (ARS) 13-3608, and all of Chapter 35.1 Sexual Exploitation Of Children.
  • In legal terms incest is about control. A prison guard having sex with an inmate is considered incest because the guard has complete and immediate control of the inmate. Workers at a group home and anyone in their charge is considered incest. And uncle and a niece is not considered incest unless the uncle is a legal guardian. Funnily enough? Two siblings of a similar age (two years or less) having sex is not considered incest. Because the slightness of the age gap prevents an overwhelming control. 24 months = Not incest, 25+ = incest.
  • "So how did we get from that definition to the social definition of "family members having sex = incest"?" (Sara) Because the law came about relatively recently--"incest" used to be so taboo that there was no legal term for it because it was just considered plain old child abuse. Now that we have grandparents raising grandchildren and sexually molesting them and fathers taking pictures of their daughters we've had to come up with specific terms so that we can punish them different from some random stranger who hurts them. Because that's a large betrayal of some very fundamental and basic things.
  • Nearly all (physical) child abuse laws are "new" because as little as forty years ago it was considered "just one of those things" and all families did it and no one talked about it.
  • Sexual abuse has always been on of the lynching list but when it was incest it was still kept in the family a lot of times because of the shame that came with it for everyone involved.
  • Arizona is actually really amazing with sexual abuse laws here; we have no statue of limitations on them.
  • You should always repost both to CPS (Child Protective Services) and the police department because what might not be enough for CPS might be enough for the police and what might not be enough for the police might be enough for CPS.
  • Maricopa County Protocol (Maricopa County, Arizona) is the most widely used child abuse reporting protocol in Arizona.
  • Among the benefits of MCP are: the number of arrests is increased, the numbers of successful prosecutions increase and the trauma to the child victims decrease.
  • Investigative Protocol is an agreement between the county's Attorney's Office and: law enforcement, in the county, CPS of the CPS equivalent, forensic pediatricians, forensic interviewers, and therapists.
  • The old way child abuse was reported, pre Protocols was: children were taken to the police station (not a child friendly environment), suspects were taken to the same building (handcuffed, resisting kicking, cursing and/or screaming), and there was always the risk of the suspect and child being together in the same room at the same time.
  • Child interviews were not recorded, were done by detectives with little/no training in children, other agencies did not observes, interview rooms were interrogation rooms that suspects were questioned in and it was not a child friendly environment at all.
  • Police and CPS used to butt heads because they had separate investigations going on. It required numerous interviews of the child, gave the child the appearance of disbelief, extra stress on the child, the stress was increased and the information was not shared between the two groups.
  • The old Medical Exams were done at local Medical Centers, were not child friendly, had long ER waits, included more interviews by the medical staff, no expert pediatric physicians and increased stress/trauma to the child.
  • Maricopa County has Childhelp USA (http://www.childhelp.org/) which is a Child Advocacy Center and has: CPS on site, detectives on site, forensic interviews available, crisis intervention and counseling, forensic pediatricians on site and interview and exam rooms that are both on site and very child friendly.
  • Child Advocacy Centers: Provide a child friendly environments, have playrooms for kids, do not allow suspects and have child friendly exam and interview rooms. The forensic interviews are conducted by well trained staff, audio and video recorded, monitoring is available from other rooms and children are often more at ease with the environment and surroundings.
  • Police and CPS now conduct interviews together (which reduces repeat interviews and narrows the chance of a child victim and suspect to come face-to-face unnecessarily) and share information between each other.
  • If sexual abuse is suspected the police do not need the parent's permission to give the child an exam.
  • The investigation starts with the original report take either by the police officer or detective.
  • Patrol officers are always the first responders to all calls for a report.
  • The four questions always/only asked of the children (in non-sexual offenses) are: What happened? Is it a crime? Who did it? Is it an in home situation? Where did it happen? Establish jurisdiction. When did it happen? Is an exam required immediately?
  • Exams need to be done within 72 hours (three days) for evidence on the body to be found.
  • The reason the four questions are the only ones asked are: It provides the essential information, it's not meant to be an investigation yet and asking more risks contamination the investigation.
  • Detective originals: any case involving serious burns, hospitalization, serious injuries, when the child is at risk in the home and/or there has been sexual abuse within the last 72 hours.
  • Patrol initiated reports: are dictated onto a phone line in report form for later typing. They are hopefully typed in a few days, reports are assigned to the child crimes unit if they fit, separate among three squads, the appropriate sergeant assigns a case to a Detective and then the Detective begins the investigation.
  • Police are now mandated to report to CPS.
  • Detective originals: assume investigation from patrol, conduct victim interviews, conduct witness interviews, AND OTHER STUFF BUT HE MOVES THE SLIDES TO FUCKING QUICKLY.
  • Flow of investigation: Victim interview should be first (you need to know what happened) any medical exams need to be done ASAP, all witnesses must be interviews, evidence must be obtained, suspect interview is last (you may only get one shot at it and you need to have all your ducks in a row for it).
  • Child interviews: Introduction, names are given (not identified as police employees/CPS), job is stated ("It's my job to talk to boys and girls about things that...")
  • THE RULES: "We only discuss things that really happened...", "If I say something you don't understand it's okay to correct me or ask something...", "I repeat things said to me to be sure I heard you right..."

[identity profile] annella.livejournal.com 2007-10-20 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. This is really interesting.

Two siblings of a similar age (two years or less) having sex is not considered incest. Because the slightness of the age gap prevents an overwhelming control.

Especially that!

[identity profile] girlfan1979.livejournal.com 2007-10-20 02:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, I've read (more than once) that although full-blown sexual contact between siblings raised together is unlikely, minor "playing doctor" stuff is actually really common.

Any mention of that clex_monkie?

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I've read that too in several books and apparently it was discussed a little in Soc last semester during one of the classes I missed. It wasn't really talked about in this seminar because this was mostly focusing on how to investigate child abuse and how to identify it. We only spent so long on incest because it's a large part of the sexual abuse portion.

[identity profile] girlfan1979.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Any chance you could pull a reading list from that class and point us in the direction of some repuable sources?

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
HA! Reading list. I go to a community college, I can tell you my text book but it was all that and slides. Half the class shared text books because no one here can afford shit.

[identity profile] girlfan1979.livejournal.com 2007-10-27 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
Noone here can afford the damn books either :(

But sure, the name of your textbook would be cool.

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-27 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Cool. I'm at my Mom's right now but when I get back to Phil's I'll take a look and let you know.

[identity profile] girlfan1979.livejournal.com 2007-10-27 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks hon! I appreciate it.

I hope you have a great weekend.

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't it?

[identity profile] astrothsknot.livejournal.com 2007-10-20 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
My mind is still boggling with the idea that there are statutes of limitations in other states. There's no such thing where I come from. A crime is a crime and it never stops being a crime.

The only thing that causes contention is that sometimes people are prosecuted and sentenced according to laws that existed at the time of the crime, rather than what the law and sentence is now.

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not entirely sure why they have statutes of limitations in other states. I'm sure they have reasons, I'm just... At a loss as to what they may be.

[identity profile] star-dancer54.livejournal.com 2007-10-20 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
Absolutely fascinating. Seriously. *adds to faves for future reference*

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't it just?

[identity profile] moonmelody.livejournal.com 2007-10-20 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
It's interesting to read what you're being taught in the classroom in comparison to how these matters actually transpire in the real world.

[identity profile] clex_monkie89.livejournal.com 2007-10-26 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Aw, you can't just say something like that and leave it there because now I'm curious. I always knew that being as how Arizona's laws are weird and I'm only at a community college that I wasn't getting as much information as I would at say ASU but I never thought I could be getting wrong information.

Any really big differences you could point out to me?